Timothy T. Taylor Home Page
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Articles and Writing
Economics Textbook
Classroom Teaching
The Teaching Company
High School Pedagogy

Articles and Writing

September 12, 1988
"Someone Else has Your Lucky Number"
San Jose Mercury News
By Timothy Taylor
<< Back to 1988 menu

I'M sure that Robert Barnett of Riverside and Christene Lentz of Capistrano Beach are deserving people. Very deserving. But despite how very deserving I'm sure they are, the news that the two of them will split a $39.1 million jackpot in the state lottery must raise a fundamental question in the mind of every public-spirited Californian:

How can I improve my chances of getting that money?

The odds of winning the lotto jackpot by picking the correct six numbers between 1 and 49 are just terrible. The odds of matching the six numbers are about one-fortieth as good as the chance of dying this year by accidental electrocution.

However, there is a perfectly serious system to beat the lottery over time, and I am going to tell it to you right here. I am not joking or making fun. This method is as certain as mathematics.

First of all, you must understand that unless someone has inserted a carefully placed monkey wrench in the machinery, no one can choose the six winning numbers in advance.

The combination 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is just as likely to come up as any other combination of six numbers between 1 and 49.

Anyone who tries to tell you that they can predict the winning numbers is just blowing smoke. If they know, after all, why aren't they rich already?

Remember, Barnett and Lentz let a machine choose their ticket numbers at random. Letting the machine choose is just as accurate a way of choosing the winning six numbers as betting, say, the age of your cousins or the humidity during the past week or the predictions of your neighborhood psychic.

So if I'm not going to tell you what the winning numbers will be, how can I tell you a way to beat the lottery?

Here's the answer. The numbers that come up as winners are chosen at random, but the numbers that people bet on are not chosen at random.

For example, studies done by William T. Ziemba, a professor of management science at the University of British Columbia, show that the numbers from 1 to 31 are generally bet more often than numbers from 32 to 49, because so many people bet their birth dates.

Research (later confirmed by Ziemba's work) done by Herman Chernoff, a professor of mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, showed that people also tend not to choose numbers ending in 0, 9 or 8. The same numbers seem to stay unpopular year after year.

For all you greedballs still following this explanation, here's the payoff: If you bet the same popular numbers as everyone else, then if you win the lottery it is relatively likely that you will have to share the prize with someone else who bet on the same numbers. But if you bet on the unpopular numbers, then if you win it is fairly likely the prize will be yours and yours alone.

This advantage can be quite substantial. Normally, for every dollar bet in the lottery, 50 cents is paid out in prizes. On average, you should expect to lose 50 cents in the lottery every time you bet a dollar.

If you bet the popular numbers you should expect to lose even more, because you're likely to have to share the prize when you win.

But by choosing the unpopular numbers, you can improve your expected winnings dramatically. The fact that you are unlikely to have to share the prize means that your expected return will climb as high as $2 for every dollar bet. Instead of expecting to lose 50 cents on average, you expect to win a dollar on average for every dollar bet.

I emphasize again that there are no tricks here. Betting the unpopular numbers is, on average, a winning bet. But before you hock the house and the spouse to play the lottery, two words of warning.

First of all, even with the odds in your favor, you will probably have to lose a lot of money for a long time before you collect your winnings.

Richard Thaler, an economics professor at Cornell University, uses this metaphor to explain the problem in a recent article: "Consider a hypothetical carnival game with 1 million spokes. You pay $1 for a number between one and 1 million, and you get $2 million if your choice comes up. While you have an edge, the chance of winning is so small that you will probably go bankrupt before you win the jackpot."

The second problem is that if everyone bets on the unpopular numbers, then they won't be unpopular any more, and this whole system won't work.

So don't mention this article to anyone.

But just for your information, the 19 most unpopular numbers, in order, are 40, 39, 20, 30, 41, 38, 42, 46, 29, 49, 48, 32, 10, 47, 1, 37, 28, 34 and 45.

<< Back to 1988 menu